In Focus

Towards a Pan-European Transfusion Research InfrAstructure (PETRA)

How to improve alignment and exchange of vein-to-vein data across Europe and beyond

Katja van den Hurk

Sanquin Blood Supply, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Read bio >

Sophie Wehrens

Sanquin Blood Supply, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Read bio >

Hayley Evans

NIHR Data Driven BTRU, Oxford, UK

Read bio >

Simon J Stanworth

NHSBT, Oxford, UK

Read bio >

Blood donation and transfusion carry risks for both donors and patient recipients. Major medical complications may include donor iron depletion, immunomodulatory effects in patients, Transfusion-Associated Circulatory Overload (TACO), and even increased mortality in certain contexts, such as liberal platelet transfusions in preterm infants. Despite progress supported by randomized trials, many areas of transfusion medicine practice still suffer from a lack of high-quality evidence, resulting in inconsistent practices, unnecessary transfusions, and wasted resources.

To address these challenges, the European Hematology Association (EHA) supported a 2022 transfusion conference in Prague, also involving membership from the European Blood Alliance (EBA) and ISBT, to set priorities for advancing transfusion research in Europe. A key outcome was the recognition of the need for robust, collaborative electronic data systems that can link donor and recipient information. Establishing such comprehensive “vein-to-vein” datasets would transform transfusion research and safety, enabling large-scale epidemiological studies, predictive modeling, and more cost-effective clinical trials, while allowing Europe to better understand how donor and product characteristics influence patient outcomes.

In Europe, the most complete example of such a vein-to-vein database is the Scandinavian Donation and Transfusion (SCANDAT) database. SCANDAT integrates data from donors, donations, transfusions, and recipients in Denmark and Sweden, further linked to national health and population registers. This database enables various studies, such as investigating donor characteristics in relation to transfusion-related biomarker changes,1 and intracerebral hemorrhage in donors and patients.2 It is important to recognize that efforts are made to build and maintain the SCANDAT database, and that additional efforts are required to extend this data resource to allow research across other European regions. While similar datasets could be developed elsewhere, long term follow up of donors and recipients depends on access to national health registers, which are not universally available across Europe.

The PETRA project

With support from an EBA Research Grant, we are pursuing three core objectives:

  1. Undertake surveys of existing data repositories in Europe
  2. Perform an exemplary proof-of-concept analysis of ‘Where Does Blood Go’ using routine data and electronic systems
  3. Develop an action plan for building vein-to-vein research infrastructures across Europe

The overarching aim is to inform the wider development of aligned ‘vein-to-vein’ donor to patient datasets at a European level, to be maintained prospectively. We are building partnerships for a broader and ambitious program of transfusion and donor health research, in collaboration with multiple partners including EBA, EHA, and ISBT, as well as blood establishments and hospitals across Europe.

Where we stand

Our survey of 17 blood establishments across 16 countries found that 59% could establish vein-to-vein links for transfusion research, though only 29% had automated systems to do so. Although data on donors, components, and recipients can be collected, data linkage enabling long-term health outcome follow-up remains difficult. Scandinavian registers facilitate such tracking, but most other countries must rely on ad hoc approaches. Survey respondents highlighted that advancing PETRA will require addressing key challenges including appropriate legal frameworks, consent processes, and adequate resourcing.

Building on this foundation, PETRA partners analysed hospital data flows and digital capabilities across 12 hospitals in 10 European countries. Most sites reported integrated electronic health record and laboratory systems capturing transfusion events and patient information, creating opportunities for linkage to clinical outcomes. However, only about one-third had direct electronic integration with blood-supplier systems, and fewer than half could access linked surgical or treatment data. Limited IT resources, weak interoperability, and restricted analytical capacity were the most common barriers. Drawing on these insights, PETRA has conducted an iterative consensus process to design a harmonised core dataset covering both site-level information and key transfusion indicators, including pre-transfusion haemoglobin, single-unit and massive transfusions, and iron-deficiency anaemia. Twenty hospitals have now collected this dataset along with data source information demonstrating that aggregate level electronic reporting is feasible across diverse digital systems while also highlighting where more detailed recording and stronger electronic capabilities are needed to support future benchmarking and research.

PETRA is now advancing a more extensive “Where Does Blood Go?” study, in which participating hospitals will link transfusion records with ICD-10 diagnosis and surgical procedure codes to map patterns of red-cell, plasma, and platelet use across Europe. This analysis will quantify transfusion demand, highlight variation between specialties and countries, and illustrate the potential of harmonised transfusion data for benchmarking and patient blood management initiatives. Together, these efforts lay the groundwork for a sustainable, pan-European vein-to-vein data infrastructure to improve transfusion practice and patient outcomes.

While analyzing these initial findings we are developing a strategic plan for a coordinated European approach to donor and transfusion health data. This plan will identify key enablers and barriers, along with mitigation strategies, to ensure fair, open and equitable access to donor, product and patient data. It will also define infrastructure requirements, governance frameworks, and stakeholder roles, together with a roadmap for future collaborations and grant applications to advance PETRA.

A call to action

Within the ISBT community, collaboration is key. Building a Pan-European Transfusion Research Infrastructure is the next step towards greater alignment, shared learning, and scientific breakthroughs to improve donation and transfusion practices worldwide. Please contact us via petraproject@sanquin.nl for more information.

References

1. Ekström LD, Clements M, Roubinian N, Zhao J, Dahlén T, Busch MP, Edgren G. An agnostic study of donor and component factors associated with transfusion-related changes in laboratory markers. Transfusion. 2025 May;65(5):886-896. doi: 10.1111/trf.18249. Epub 2025 Apr 10. PMID: 40208213; PMCID: PMC12088316. 2. Zhao J, Rostgaard K, Lauwers E, Dahlén T, Ostrowski SR, Erikstrup C, Pedersen OB, de Strooper B, Lemmens R, Hjalgrim H, Edgren G. Intracerebral Hemorrhage Among Blood Donors and Their Transfusion Recipients. JAMA. 2023 Sep 12;330(10):941-950. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.14445. PMID: 37698562; PMCID: PMC10498336.


PETRA Consortium members

  • A Allameddine (Northern Ireland Blood Transfusion Service, UK)
  • I Alonso (Portuguese Institute of Blood and Transplantation, Portugal)
  • M Arvas (Finnish Red Cross Blood Service, Finland)
  • I Bojanić (University Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia)
  • D Borg Aquilina (Mater Dei Hospital Blood Bank, Malta)
  • E Di Angelantonio (University of Cambridge, UK)
  • L Drechsler (Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark)
  • C Erikstrup (Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark)
  • Niall Flavin (National Haemovigilance Office, Ireland)
  • S.F. Fustolo-Gunnink (Sanquin, the Netherlands)
  • F Garban (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble Alpes, France)
  • J Grífols Ronda (Banc de Sang i Teixits de Catalunya, Spain)
  • J.A. García-Erce (Banco de Sangre y Tejidos de Navarra, Spain)
  • K Hands (Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, UK)
  • M Ilmakunnas (Helsinki University Hospital, Finland)
  • R Kullaste (North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Estonia)
  • M Jacques (Établissement Français du Sang, France)
  • U La Rocca (Italian National Blood Center, Italy)
  • P Mali (Slovenian Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Slovenia)
  • J Mance (Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Croatia)
  • A Masi Roig (Banc de Sang i Teixits de Catalunya, Spain)
  • A Millan Alvarez (Banc de Sang i Teixits de Catalunya, Spain)
  • A Paula (Portuguese Institute of Blood and Transplantation, Portugal)
  • M Raos (University Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia)
  • M Ribeirinho (Portuguese Institute of Blood and Transplantation, Portugal)
  • L Schönborn (University Hospital Greifswald, Germany)
  • C So-Osman (Sanquin, the Netherlands)
  • A Stewart (Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, UK)
  • T Thiele (University Hospital Greifswald, Germany)
  • E Turkulainen (Finnish Red Cross Blood Service, Finland)
  • M Vinkovic (Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Croatia),
  • A Waters (Irish Blood Transfusion Service, Ireland)
  • S.M.T. Wehrens (Sanquin, the Netherlands)
  • H Evans (University of Oxford, UK)
  • S Stanworth (University of Oxford, UK)
  • K van den Hurk (Sanquin, the Netherlands)
Contents